Consumer Reports revisits Bendgate

You've seen the video of an iPhone 6 Plus being bent, but what does it mean? How much force was actually applied? What about the same "test" applied to the Samsung Galaxy Note 4? Is the force the same? Greater? Less?

Consumer Reports steps into the breach with some objective tests of the the forces necessary to bend iPhone 6, 6 Plus, as well as some comparable top-of-the-line smartphones.

Testing concluded that:

● IPhone 6 Plus is more resistant to bending than the iPhone 6
● Both are more bend resistant than the HTC One (M8)
● Both are scored lower than (in order of increasing bend resistance) LG G3, Apple iPhone 5, & Samsung Galaxy Note 3.

Perhaps most important is Consumer Reports closing comment: "While nothing is (evidently) indestructible, we expect that any of these phones should stand up to typical use."

http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/news/2014/09/consumer-reports-tests-iphone-6-bendgate/index.htm / bent iPhone 6 creasing iPhone 6 Plus bare hands unscientific lab equipment delicate same tests comparable smart phones tougher test stress test phones three-point flexural test supported at two points either end force applied third point on the top measured force high precision Instron compression test machine tested LG G3 Samsung Galaxy Note 3 HTC One M8 iPhone 5 bendgate controversy Apple invited journalists labs stress tests published reports 25 kilograms 55 pounds force test flex increased force 10 pound increments deform engineers screen come loose case results tough more robust our testing deform 90 pounds of force came apart 110 pounds of force outperformed regarded sturdy solid phone underperformed some other smart phones recovered completely each step up in force screen splintered stopped working serious damage phones continued to work screens illuminated functional to the touch call smartphone smart phone carnage significant force damage indestructible typical use /